MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
28CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
44.6Benchmarks81.1
54.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 702510 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 39.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+45) and benchmarks (+36). MediaTek Dimensity 7025 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7025
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 45
- 1722% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 57,772
- 381% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,250
- 326% higher AnTuTu: 2,827,538 vs 664,087
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 2 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 664,087Bottom 17% | 2,827,538+326%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 255,422Bottom 19% | 947,776+271%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 57,772Bottom 17% | 1,052,625+1722%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 150,942Bottom 19% | 347,409+130%Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 199,951Bottom 17% | 479,728+140%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 950Bottom 42% | 2,995+215%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,250Bottom 39% | 10,824+381%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Samsung Exynos 1280VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

