MediaTek Dimensity 7060 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
29.6CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
44.4Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
36Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 70605 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+30) and CPU (+28). MediaTek Dimensity 7060 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7060
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 30
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 44
- 242% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 2,400
- 122% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,038
- 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X / LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 2.8 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 657,941Bottom 15% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 264,976Bottom 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 57,550Bottom 15% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 130,622Bottom 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 204,793Bottom 20% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,038Top 48% | 2,300+122%Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,400Bottom 44% | 8,200+242%Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,400Top 18% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7060vs Unisoc Tiger T820VSMediaTek Dimensity 7060vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 7060vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSMediaTek Dimensity 7060vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

