MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
29.5CPU57.2
24GPU54.3
47.7Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
36Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 71006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 33.1, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+30) and CPU (+28). MediaTek Dimensity 7100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 30
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 24
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 48
- 533% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 695
- 181% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 2,914
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-5500 / LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 3.3 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 1200x2600 @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 750,153Bottom 24% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 307,696Bottom 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 85,426Bottom 18% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 147,214Bottom 18% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 209,817Bottom 18% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,001Bottom 46% | 2,300+130%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,914Top 50% | 8,200+181%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 695Bottom 10% | 4,400+533%Top 19% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7100vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSMediaTek Dimensity 7100vs Huawei Kirin 9020VSMediaTek Dimensity 7100vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSMediaTek Dimensity 7100vs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

