MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
33.1CPU57.2
28.7GPU54.3
49.6Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
36Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 80207 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 36, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+26) and benchmarks (+25). MediaTek Dimensity 8020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 33
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 50
- 249% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,262
- 128% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 3,600
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz+27% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G77 MC9 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 570 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 809,277Bottom 34% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 282,056Bottom 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 139,570Bottom 39% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 138,421Bottom 15% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 249,230Bottom 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,120Top 43% | 2,300+105%Top 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,600Top 36% | 8,200+128%Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,262Bottom 43% | 4,400+249%Top 18% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs MediaTek Dimensity 900VSMediaTek Dimensity 8020vs MediaTek Helio G100VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

