Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 810
33.8Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
25.2CPU30.7
30.9Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 8101 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 810

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 25

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20212026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133—
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)—
Max download2.8 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.15.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—
Video capture2K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu385,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)750Bottom 31%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,950Bottom 28%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup