MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Unisoc T7225
36.6CPU20
33.1GPU35
53.6Benchmarks—
73.8Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82001 spec wins — Unisoc T7225
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7225 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 20
- 72% higher Max clock: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 67% lower process: 4 nm vs 12 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7225
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 650 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-1600 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc T7225 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 950,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750Top 35% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 48% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSUnisoc T7225vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc T7225vs MediaTek Helio G91VSUnisoc T7225vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS