MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 1610
41.5CPU30.7
38GPU—
65.5Benchmarks—
73.8Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 83001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8300
- Stronger CPU score: 42 vs 31
- 40% higher Max clock: 3.35 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | — |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+40% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 780 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,524,125Top 46% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 439,015Bottom 52% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 422,306Top 46% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 298,333Top 44% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 364,471Top 49% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,400Top 35% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,500Top 30% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 49% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Apple A15 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Google Tensor G4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS