MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
41CPU72.6
39.6GPU77.4
66.5Benchmarks81.1
73.8Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 835011 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 51.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+38) and CPU (+32). MediaTek Dimensity 8350 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8350
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 41
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 40
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 67
- 178% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,600
- 152% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,300
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 655 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,588,273Top 44% | 2,827,538+78%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 385,120Bottom 49% | 947,776+146%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 488,106Top 38% | 1,052,625+116%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 318,014Top 36% | 347,409+9%Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 397,033Top 44% | 479,728+21%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,400Top 35% | 2,995+114%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,300Top 33% | 10,824+152%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600Top 45% | 7,230+178%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Google Tensor G4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Samsung Exynos 1580VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

