MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
45.9CPU39.3
46.1GPU35.5
71.7Benchmarks57.3
73.8Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.3 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+14) and GPU (+11). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 57
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 67
- 77% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,946,644 vs 1,100,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 10% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 1,450
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+16% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,946,644+77%Top 12% | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 28% | 1,600+10%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400+54%Top 16% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400+62%Top 32% | 2,100Top 51% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 560,176Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 642,040Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 339,619Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 404,809Top 32% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

