MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
45.9CPU72.6
46.1GPU77.4
71.7Benchmarks81.1
73.8Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 840011 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 56.3, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+31) and CPU (+27). MediaTek Dimensity 8400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 46
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 72
- 113% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 3,400
- 107% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 1,450
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,946,644Top 31% | 2,827,538+45%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 560,176Top 37% | 947,776+69%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 642,040Top 28% | 1,052,625+64%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 339,619Top 28% | 347,409+2%Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 404,809Top 37% | 479,728+19%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 31% | 2,995+107%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400Top 18% | 10,824+69%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 36% | 7,230+113%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

