MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
45.9CPU27
46.1GPU—
71.7Benchmarks35.9
73.8Efficiency52.5
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84000 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.3 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+36) and efficiency (+21). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 53
- 314% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,946,644 vs 470,000
- 299% higher Max bandwidth: 68.3 GB/s vs 17.1 GB/s
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 6 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+20% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s+299% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,946,644+314%Top 12% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450+110%Top 28% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400+184%Top 16% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 560,176Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 642,040Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 339,619Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 404,809Top 32% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS
