MediaTek Dimensity 8550 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
47CPU57.2
54.4GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
68Efficiencyspec-based79.6
3 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 85504 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 54.1, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+10). MediaTek Dimensity 8550 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8550
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 47
- 48% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,559
- 33% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 6,166
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC8 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-Advanced modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,559Top 29% | 2,300+48%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,166Top 21% | 8,200+33%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,411Top 18% | 4,400Top 19% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8550vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 8550vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 8550vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8550vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

