Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 900
36.4Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
27.4CPU30.7
35.9Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 900

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 27

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20212026
Process6 nm—
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G68 MC4Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-3200—
Max bandwidth25.6 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—
Video capture4K@30fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 900 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 900Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu470,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)920Bottom 39%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,300Bottom 40%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup