MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
27.4CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
35.9Benchmarks81.1
54.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9005 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 36.4, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+45) and benchmarks (+45). MediaTek Dimensity 900 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 900
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 36
- 371% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,300
- 226% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 920
- 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 2 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G68 MC4 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 900 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 470,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 920Bottom 39% | 2,995+226%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,300Bottom 40% | 10,824+371%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 900vs MediaTek Helio G100VSMediaTek Dimensity 900vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778GVSMediaTek Dimensity 900vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Dimensity 900vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

