MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 1680
66.2CPU38.7
69.8GPU40.8
80.7Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
77.2Efficiencyspec-based68
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.3 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+29) and CPU (+28). Samsung Exynos 1680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 63
- 262% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,300 vs 1,742
- 111% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,900 vs 1,376
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+29% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps+37% | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,784,235Top 14% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 829,825Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 946,941Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 370,838Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 636,631Top 9% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900+111%Top 10% | 1,376Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000+104%Top 7% | 4,411Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300+262%Top 9% | 1,742Top 62% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

