MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 2200
66.2CPU39.3
69.8GPU35.5
80.7Benchmarks57.3
77.2Efficiency66.5
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.3 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+34) and CPU (+27). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 57
- Stronger efficiency score: 77 vs 67
- 200% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,300 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+33% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,784,235+153%Top 4% | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900+81%Top 9% | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000+117%Top 6% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300+200%Top 5% | 2,100Top 51% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 829,825Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 946,941Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 370,838Top 6% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 636,631Top 9% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

