MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
66.2CPU49.9
69.8GPU47.8
80.7Benchmarks66.7
77.2Efficiencyspec-based66.5
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.3 to 55.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+22) and CPU (+16). Samsung Exynos 2400e still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 50
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 48
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 67
- 75% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,300 vs 3,600
- 41% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,900 vs 2,050
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+20% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,784,235Top 17% | 1,600,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 829,825Top 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 946,941Top 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 370,838Top 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 636,631Top 11% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900+41%Top 11% | 2,050Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000+41%Top 8% | 6,400Top 19% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300+75%Top 9% | 3,600Top 30% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500sVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS