MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
25.6CPU38.7
—GPU40.8
41.3Benchmarks62.7
—AIspec-based56.5
54.9Efficiencyspec-based68
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G2005 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1680 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 50.2 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+21) and CPU (+13). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 63 vs 41
- 110% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,411 vs 2,100
- 81% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,376 vs 760
- 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+21% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,200 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-13 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | — | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 581,818Top 92% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 212,630Top 95% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 47,609Top 92% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 152,829Top 78% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 168,750Top 95% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 760Top 68% | 1,376+81%Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,100Top 65% | 4,411+110%Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,742Top 62% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

