MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
25.6CPU39.3
—GPU35.5
41.3Benchmarks57.3
54.9Efficiency66.5
2 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G2005 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+16) and CPU (+14). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 111% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 760
- 98% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,150 vs 2,100
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-13 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 581,818Top 56% | 1,100,000+89%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 760Top 66% | 1,600+111%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,100Top 63% | 4,150+98%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,100Top 51% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 212,630Top 95% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 47,609Top 92% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 152,829Top 78% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 168,750Top 95% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS