MediaTek Helio G95 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
20.7CPU39.3
—GPU35.5
27Benchmarks57.3
41.8Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G956 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 27.5, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+30) and efficiency (+25). MediaTek Helio G95 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G95
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 21
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 27
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 42
- 233% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 330,000
- 214% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 510
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2022 |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.05 GHz | 2.8 GHz+37% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 90Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G95 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 330,000Top 80% | 1,100,000+233%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 510Top 80% | 1,600+214%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,650Top 79% | 4,150+152%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio G95vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSMediaTek Helio G95vs MediaTek Helio G90TVSMediaTek Helio G95vs MediaTek Helio G35VSMediaTek Helio G95vs MediaTek Helio P35VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
