MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
21.6CPU39.3
—GPU35.5
20Benchmarks57.3
46.7Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Helio P356 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 26.9, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+37) and efficiency (+20). MediaTek Helio P35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio P35
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 1003% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 145
- 948% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 105,000
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2022 |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 4 W+56% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1600 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | HD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 105,000Top 100% | 1,100,000+948%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 145Top 98% | 1,600+1003%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 520Top 100% | 4,150+698%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio P35vs MediaTek Helio G35VSMediaTek Helio P35vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675VSMediaTek Helio P35vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835VSMediaTek Helio P35vs MediaTek Helio G90TVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
