Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
20CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
20Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
46.7Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6367 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+54) and CPU (+37). Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
- 50% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 47
- 1094% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 180,000
- 785% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 260
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2025 |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm+79% |
| TDP (typical) | 4 W+50% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) + 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz+83% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 509 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 680 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4-1333 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 10.7 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X12 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 180,000Top 94% | 2,150,000+1094%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 260Top 95% | 2,300+785%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,000Top 94% | 8,200+720%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,400Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636vs MediaTek Helio G85VSQualcomm Snapdragon 636vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSQualcomm Snapdragon 636vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSQualcomm Snapdragon 636vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS
