Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 2500
29.7CPU57.2
24.9GPU54.3
48.8Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
54.9Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 36.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+29) and CPU (+28). Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 30
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 55
- 450% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 800
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+37% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon 770 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X53 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 3.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 784,274Top 43% | 2,150,000+174%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,020Top 48% | 2,300+125%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,930Top 44% | 8,200+180%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 800Top 87% | 4,400+450%Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 310,105Top 69% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 95,255Top 80% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 162,954Top 63% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 215,960Top 83% | — |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778Gvs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 778Gvs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSQualcomm Snapdragon 778Gvs MediaTek Dimensity 900VSQualcomm Snapdragon 778Gvs MediaTek Helio G100VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

