Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 1680
37.2CPU38.7
34.3GPU40.8
55.9Benchmarks62.7
64AIspec-based56.5
55.9Efficiencyspec-based68
3 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 8886 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1680
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1680 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 50.2 to 45.7, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+7) and GPU (+7). Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
- 47% higher Max download: 7.5 Gbps vs 5.1 Gbps
- 33% higher AI performance: 26 TOPS vs 20 TOPS
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 63 vs 56
- 43% higher GPU clock: 1,200 MHz vs 840 MHz
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,411 vs 3,650
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz | 2.9 GHz+2% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Samsung Xclipse 550 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | 1,200 MHz+43% |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon 780 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 26 TOPS+33% | 20 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X60 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps+47% | 5.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 1680 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,040,324Top 56% | 1,363,464 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 379,461Top 56% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 169,822Top 64% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 200,968Top 53% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 290,073Top 56% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450+5%Top 30% | 1,376Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,650Top 37% | 4,411+21%Top 29% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,550Top 66% | 1,742+12%Top 62% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Apple A14 BionicVSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VS

