Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
37.2CPU72.6
34.3GPU77.4
55.9Benchmarks81.1
64AIspec-based—
55.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 88811 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 45.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+43) and CPU (+35). Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 56
- 520% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 169,822
- 366% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,550
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 2 nm+60% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.84 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon 780 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 26 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X60 5G | — |
| Max download | 7.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 60Hz / QHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,040,324Top 56% | 2,827,538+172%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 379,461Top 56% | 947,776+150%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 169,822Top 64% | 1,052,625+520%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 200,968Top 53% | 347,409+73%Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 290,073Top 56% | 479,728+65%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 30% | 2,995+107%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,650Top 37% | 10,824+197%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,550Top 66% | 7,230+366%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Apple A14 BionicVSQualcomm Snapdragon 888vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

