Qualcomm Snapdragon C vs Samsung Exynos 2200
30.7CPU39.3
—GPU35.5
—Benchmarks57.3
39.4Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+27) and CPU (+9). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 39
- 50% lower process: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 17% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2022 |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARMv8-A | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X15 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 0.8 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 2560x1440 | — |
| Video capture | 4K at 30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon C | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | — | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

