Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc T620
38.7CPU25.3
40.8GPU55
62.7Benchmarks—
56.5AIspec-based—
68Efficiencyspec-based20
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16800 spec wins — Unisoc T620
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T620 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 25
- 67% lower process: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- 41% higher GPU clock: 1,200 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 32% higher Max clock: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T620
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 41
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz+32% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | 1,200 MHz+41% | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 20 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) |
| Max download | 5.1 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 90Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T620 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,363,464 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,376Top 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,411Top 31% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742Bottom 45% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSUnisoc T620vs MediaTek Helio G100VSUnisoc T620vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc T620vs Huawei Kirin 9010VSUnisoc T620vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VS