Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc T7300
38.7CPU25.3
40.8GPU65
62.7Benchmarks—
56.5AIspec-based—
68Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16800 spec wins — Unisoc T7300
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 25
- 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 32% higher Max clock: 2.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 26% higher GPU clock: 1,200 MHz vs 950 MHz
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300
- Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 41
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz+32% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 1,200 MHz+26% | 950 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 20 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) |
| Max download | 5.1 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional) |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 2K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,363,464 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,376Top 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,411Top 31% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742Bottom 45% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSUnisoc T7300vs Huawei Kirin 8020VSUnisoc T7300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSUnisoc T7300vs MediaTek Helio G200VSUnisoc T7300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VS

