Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Unisoc T8200
38.7CPU28
40.8GPU55
62.7Benchmarks—
56.5AIspec-based—
68Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16800 spec wins — Unisoc T8200
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 28
- 41% higher GPU clock: 1,200 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 26% higher Max clock: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 41
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz+26% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 1,200 MHz+41% | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 20 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA) |
| Max download | 5.1 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional) |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T8200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,363,464 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,376Top 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,411Top 31% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742Bottom 45% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSUnisoc T8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSUnisoc T8200vs Huawei Kirin 8020VSUnisoc T8200vs MediaTek Helio G200VSUnisoc T8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VS

