Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
39.3CPU21.6
35.5GPU—
57.3Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency44.2
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+37) and efficiency (+22). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 44
- 412% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 215,000
- 357% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 350
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+60% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 5 W+44% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,100,000+412%Top 28% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600+357%Top 27% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150+232%Top 30% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100Top 51% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
