Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc SC9863A
39.3CPU20
35.5GPU—
57.3Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency44.2
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22001 spec wins — Unisoc SC9863A
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 25.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+37) and efficiency (+22). Unisoc SC9863A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 44
- 1233% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 120
- 1000% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 100,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc SC9863A
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+86% | 28 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 5 W+44% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 + 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+75% | 1.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | IMG PowerVR GE8322 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3-933 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 7.5 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-4 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | — | 4.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | HD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc SC9863A |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,100,000+1000%Top 28% | 100,000Top 100% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600+1233%Top 27% | 120Top 100% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150+865%Top 30% | 430Top 100% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100Top 51% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSUnisoc SC9863Avs MediaTek Helio G80VSUnisoc SC9863Avs MediaTek Helio G81VSUnisoc SC9863Avs Huawei Kirin 710VSUnisoc SC9863Avs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660VS
