Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
39.3CPU20
35.5GPU—
57.3Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+37) and efficiency (+20). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 340% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 250,000
- 281% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 4 W+56% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+56% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,100,000+340%Top 28% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600+281%Top 27% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150+177%Top 30% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100Top 51% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS