Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
57.2CPU28
54.3GPU—
74.2Benchmarks—
85.9AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based20
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 25000 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 28
- 70% lower process: 3 nm vs 10 nm
- 43% higher Max clock: 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2018 |
| Process | 3 nm+70% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.3 GHz+43% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 59 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,150,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300Top 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,200Top 10% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,400Top 18% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

