Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Unisoc T7300
57.2CPU25.3
54.3GPU65
74.2Benchmarks—
85.9AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based36
3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 25000 spec wins — Unisoc T7300
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 25
- 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm
- 50% higher Max clock: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300
- Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 54
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.3 GHz+50% | 2.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | — | 950 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
| AI performance | 59 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional) |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 2K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Unisoc T7300 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,150,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300Top 14% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,200Top 11% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,400Top 19% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVSUnisoc T7300vs Huawei Kirin 8020VSUnisoc T7300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSUnisoc T7300vs MediaTek Helio G200VSUnisoc T7300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4VS

