Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc T7200

Unisoc SC9863A
25.6Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7200
—Inno Score
20CPU20
—GPU35
20Benchmarks—
44.2Efficiencyspec-based20
0 spec wins — Unisoc SC9863A4 spec wins — Unisoc T7200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc SC9863A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7200

  • 217% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 1,364 vs 430
  • 214% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 377 vs 120
  • 57% lower process: 12 nm vs 28 nm

General

General comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
Announced20192021
Process28 nm12 nm+57%
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
Cores88
Core configuration4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 + 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A552x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.6 GHz1.6 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
GPUIMG PowerVR GE8322Arm Mali-G57 MC1
GPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
Memory typeLPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-1600
Max bandwidth7.5 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-4Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 4Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth4.25.0

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
Max displayHD+ @ 60HzHD+ @ 90Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc SC9863A versus Unisoc T7200
SpecUnisoc SC9863AUnisoc T7200
AnTuTu100,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)120Bottom 1%377+214%Bottom 11%
Geekbench 6 (multi)430Bottom 1%1,364+217%Bottom 13%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup