Skip to content
InnoReviews

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Huawei Kirin XE90

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
75.7Inno Score
VS
Huawei Kirin XE90
—Inno Score
72Single-core—
84.2Multi-core—
42.2Efficiencyspec-based—
99.7iGPU—
79.9Platformspec-based—
1 spec wins — AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 3951 spec wins — Huawei Kirin XE90

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin XE90 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

  • 500% higher Max TDP: 120 W vs 20 W

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin XE90

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus Huawei Kirin XE90
SpecAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Huawei Kirin XE90
Announced20252026
Process4 nm—
Base TDP55 W—
Max TDP120 W+500%20 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus Huawei Kirin XE90
SpecAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Huawei Kirin XE90
Cores16—
Performance cores16—
Threads32—
Base clock3 GHz—
Boost clock5.1 GHz—
L3 cache64 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus Huawei Kirin XE90
SpecAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Huawei Kirin XE90
iGPUAMD Radeon 8060S (40 CU)—
iGPU clock2,900 MHz—

Memory

Memory comparison: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus Huawei Kirin XE90
SpecAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Huawei Kirin XE90
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8000 (256-bit, on-package)—
Max memory128 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus Huawei Kirin XE90
SpecAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Huawei Kirin XE90
Geekbench 6 (single)3,000Top 20%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)21,800Top 6%—
Cinebench R23 (single)2,080Top 15%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)37,000Top 5%—
PassMark54,913Top 7%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)10,860Top 2%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup