Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin XE90 vs Intel Celeron N4020

Huawei Kirin XE90
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Celeron N4020
28Inno Score
—Single-core20
—Multi-core20
—Efficiencyspec-based73.3
—iGPU20
—Platformspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin XE900 spec wins — Intel Celeron N4020

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin XE90 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin XE90

  • 33% higher Max TDP: 20 W vs 15 W

Reasons to pick the Intel Celeron N4020

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Celeron N4020
Announced20262019
Process—14 nm
Base TDP—6 W
Max TDP20 W+33%15 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Celeron N4020
Cores—2
Performance cores—0
Efficiency cores—2
Threads—2
Base clock—1.1 GHz
Boost clock—2.8 GHz
L3 cache—4 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Celeron N4020
iGPU—Intel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EU)
iGPU clock—650 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Celeron N4020
Memory support—DDR4-2400, LPDDR4-2400
Max memory—8 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Celeron N4020
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Celeron N4020
Cinebench R23 (single)—308Bottom 2%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—616Bottom 2%
PassMark—1,531Bottom 1%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—108Bottom 2%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup