Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin XE90 vs Intel Core 5 320

Huawei Kirin XE90
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Core 5 320
53.1Inno Score
—Single-core64.1
—Multi-core34.6
—Efficiencyspec-based93
—iGPU53.3
—Platformspec-based37.9
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin XE901 spec wins — Intel Core 5 320

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin XE90 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin XE90

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core 5 320

  • 75% higher Max TDP: 35 W vs 20 W

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core 5 320
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core 5 320
Announced20262026
Process—2 nm
Base TDP—15 W
Max TDP20 W35 W+75%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core 5 320
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core 5 320
Cores—6
Performance cores—2
Efficiency cores—4
Threads—6
Base clock—1.5 GHz
Boost clock—4.6 GHz
L3 cache—6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core 5 320
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core 5 320
iGPU—Intel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core 5 320
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core 5 320
Memory support—LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400
Max memory—64 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core 5 320
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core 5 320
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,575Top 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—7,888Bottom 25%
Cinebench R23 (single)—1,926Top 28%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—6,197Bottom 17%
PassMark—15,463Bottom 33%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—1,343Bottom 48%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup