Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin XE90 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

Huawei Kirin XE90
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
56.6Inno Score
—Single-core66.6
—Multi-core43.6
—Efficiencyspec-based73.4
—iGPU76.9
—Platformspec-based40.3
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin XE901 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin XE90 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin XE90

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

  • 85% higher Max TDP: 37 W vs 20 W

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Announced20262024
Process—3 nm
Base TDP—30 W
Max TDP20 W37 W+85%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Cores—8
Performance cores—4
Efficiency cores—4
Threads—8
Base clock—3.3 GHz
Boost clock—5.1 GHz
L3 cache—12 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
iGPU—Intel Arc 140V
iGPU clock—2,050 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Memory support—LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Max memory—32 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,870Top 26%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,500Top 50%
Cinebench R23 (single)—1,870Top 32%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—10,900Bottom 46%
PassMark—19,780Bottom 50%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—3,883Top 4%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup