Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core i9-13900HK vs Intel Core Ultra 5 332

WINNER
I
51.8Inno Score
VS
Intel Core Ultra 5 332
51.7Inno Score
59.2Single-core57.5
47.2Multi-core36
40.5Efficiencyspec-based81.4
56.6iGPU53.8
58.5Platformspec-based47.7
10 spec wins — Intel Core i9-13900HK4 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 5 332

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Intel Core i9-13900HK scores 51.8 against 51.7 for Intel Core Ultra 5 332. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Intel Core i9-13900HK edges ahead in multi-core and iGPU, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core i9-13900HK

  • Stronger multi-core score: 47 vs 36
  • 233% higher threads: 20 vs 6
  • 200% higher Performance cores: 6 vs 2
  • 133% higher cores: 14 vs 6
  • 109% higher Max TDP: 115 W vs 55 W

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 5 332

  • 80% lower process: 2 nm vs 10 nm
  • 44% lower Base TDP: 25 W vs 45 W

General

General comparison: Intel Core i9-13900HK versus Intel Core Ultra 5 332
SpecIntel Core i9-13900HKIntel Core Ultra 5 332
Announced20232026
Process10 nm2 nm+80%
Base TDP45 W25 W+44%
Max TDP115 W+109%55 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core i9-13900HK versus Intel Core Ultra 5 332
SpecIntel Core i9-13900HKIntel Core Ultra 5 332
Cores14+133%6
Performance cores6+200%2
Efficiency cores8+100%4
Threads20+233%6
Base clock2.6 GHz+4%2.5 GHz
Boost clock5.4 GHz+23%4.4 GHz
L3 cache24 MB+100%12 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core i9-13900HK versus Intel Core Ultra 5 332
SpecIntel Core i9-13900HKIntel Core Ultra 5 332
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics (96 EUs)Intel Graphics (2 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock1,500 MHz2,300 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core i9-13900HK versus Intel Core Ultra 5 332
SpecIntel Core i9-13900HKIntel Core Ultra 5 332
Memory support—LPDDR5X-7467 / DDR5-6400
Max memory—128 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core i9-13900HK versus Intel Core Ultra 5 332
SpecIntel Core i9-13900HKIntel Core Ultra 5 332
Geekbench 6 (single)2,353Bottom 24%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,063Bottom 35%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,801Top 48%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)16,138Top 38%—
PassMark26,686+80%Top 36%14,822Bottom 20%
PassMark (single thread)3,745Top 44%3,821+2%Top 39%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)1,561+14%Top 50%1,372Bottom 35%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup