Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
57.4Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
65.3Single-core—
42.2Multi-core—
88.5Efficiencyspec-based73.3
76.9iGPU—
35.9Platformspec-based28.9
2 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 7 256V1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

  • 60% higher Boost clock: 4.8 GHz vs 3 GHz
  • 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 256VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20242026
Process3 nm+50%6 nm
Base TDP17 W—
Max TDP37 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 256VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores88
Performance cores4—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads88
Base clock2.2 GHz—
Boost clock4.8 GHz+60%3 GHz
L3 cache12 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 256VQualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel Arc 140VQualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock1,950 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 256VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)—
Max memory16 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 256VQualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,753Top 35%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,850Bottom 47%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,876Top 31%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)10,244Bottom 41%—
PassMark19,478Bottom 49%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)3,883Top 4%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup