Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
66.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.6Inno Score
70.2Single-core70.3
58.9Multi-core60
81.4Efficiencyspec-based81.4
70.5iGPU70.5
58.2Platformspec-based58.2
2 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 7 366H6 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 66.2 against 66.6 for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H edges ahead in multi-core and single-core, or by price.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 366HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20262026
Process2 nm2 nm
Base TDP25 W25 W
Max TDP80 W80 W

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 366HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores1616
Performance cores44
Efficiency cores1212
Threads1616
Base clock2 GHz2.1 GHz+5%
Boost clock4.8 GHz4.9 GHz+2%
L3 cache18 MB18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 366HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPUIntel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)Intel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock2,500 MHz2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 366HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory supportLPDDR5X-8533 / DDR5-7200LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory128 GB128 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecIntel Core Ultra 7 366HIntel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)2,848Top 25%2,876+1%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)16,554+2%Top 14%16,298Top 15%
Cinebench R23 (single)2,081+1%Top 9%2,069Top 10%
Cinebench R23 (multi)18,032Top 27%19,307+7%Top 21%
PassMark34,085Top 19%36,060+6%Top 16%
PassMark (single thread)4,074Top 19%4,224+4%Top 14%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)2,912Top 21%2,912Top 21%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup