Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H vs Intel Processor N250

WINNER
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
69.6Inno Score
VS
Intel Processor N250
34.4Inno Score
74.6Single-core26.8
61.3Multi-core22.3
81.4Efficiencyspec-based82.2
88.3iGPU34.1
56.4Platformspec-based27.6
13 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra X9 388H1 spec wins — Intel Processor N250

InnoReviews verdict

Intel Core Ultra X9 388H wins this laptop processor face-off, 69.6 to 34.4, pulling ahead mainly in iGPU (+54) and single-core (+48). Intel Processor N250 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H

  • Stronger single-core score: 75 vs 27
  • Stronger multi-core score: 61 vs 22
  • Stronger iGPU score: 88 vs 34
  • 1047% higher 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU): 6,501 vs 567
  • 680% higher PassMark: 36,409 vs 4,670

Reasons to pick the Intel Processor N250

  • 76% lower Base TDP: 6 W vs 25 W

General

General comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Processor N250
Announced20262025
Process2 nm+80%10 nm
Base TDP25 W6 W+76%
Max TDP80 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Processor N250
Cores16+300%4
Performance cores40
Efficiency cores12+200%4
Threads16+300%4
Base clock2.1 GHz—
Boost clock5.1 GHz+34%3.8 GHz
L3 cache18 MB+200%6 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Processor N250
iGPUIntel Arc B390Intel Graphics (32 EU)
iGPU clock2,500 MHz1,250 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Processor N250
Memory supportLPDDR5XDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Max memory96 GB+500%16 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Core Ultra X9 388H versus Intel Processor N250
SpecIntel Core Ultra X9 388HIntel Processor N250
Geekbench 6 (single)3,038+148%Top 15%1,224Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)17,395+524%Top 13%2,786Bottom 1%
Cinebench R23 (single)2,201Top 6%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)18,911Top 19%—
PassMark36,409+680%Top 15%4,670Bottom 5%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)6,501+1047%Top 3%567Bottom 20%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup