Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Pentium Silver N6000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Pentium Silver N6000
31.2Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
22.9Single-core—
20.9Multi-core—
82.2Efficiencyspec-based73.3
22iGPU—
24.4Platformspec-based28.9
1 spec wins — Intel Pentium Silver N60004 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Pentium Silver N6000

  • 10% higher Boost clock: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

  • 100% higher cores: 8 vs 4
  • 100% higher threads: 8 vs 4
  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm

General

General comparison: Intel Pentium Silver N6000 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20212026
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
Base TDP6 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Pentium Silver N6000 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores48+100%
Performance cores0—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads48+100%
Base clock1.1 GHz—
Boost clock3.3 GHz+10%3 GHz
L3 cache4 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Pentium Silver N6000 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (32 EU)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock850 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Pentium Silver N6000 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportDDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933—
Max memory16 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Pentium Silver N6000 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Pentium Silver N6000Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cinebench R23 (single)669Bottom 4%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)1,730Bottom 4%—
PassMark2,908Bottom 3%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)329Bottom 6%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup