Skip to content
InnoReviews

Intel Processor U300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C

Intel Processor U300
44Inno Score
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon C
—Inno Score
52.1Single-core—
27.3Multi-core—
75.3Efficiencyspec-based73.3
36.9iGPU—
42.7Platformspec-based28.9
1 spec wins — Intel Processor U3004 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Qualcomm Snapdragon C lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Intel Processor U300

  • 47% higher Boost clock: 4.4 GHz vs 3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C

  • 60% higher cores: 8 vs 5
  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm
  • 33% higher threads: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Intel Processor U300 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor U300Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Announced20232026
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
Base TDP15 W—
Max TDP55 W—

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Intel Processor U300 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor U300Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Cores58+60%
Performance cores1—
Efficiency cores4—
Threads68+33%
Base clock1.2 GHz—
Boost clock4.4 GHz+47%3 GHz
L3 cache8 MB—

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Intel Processor U300 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor U300Qualcomm Snapdragon C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (48 EU)Qualcomm Adreno A643
iGPU clock1,100 MHz900 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Intel Processor U300 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor U300Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Memory supportDDR5-5200 / LPDDR5/X-5200 / DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4X-4267—
Max memory96 GB—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Intel Processor U300 versus Qualcomm Snapdragon C
SpecIntel Processor U300Qualcomm Snapdragon C
Geekbench 6 (single)2,041Bottom 18%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,369Bottom 5%—
Cinebench R23 (single)1,616Bottom 37%—
Cinebench R23 (multi)4,905Bottom 11%—
PassMark8,758Bottom 12%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)643Bottom 22%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup