Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
47.6chipPerformance50
44.6Display44.1
68Battery73.3
50.6Portability39.8
3 spec wins — Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) scores 51.9 against 51.8 for ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) edges ahead in portability and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)
- Stronger portability score: 51 vs 40
- 23% lower thickness: 19.9 mm vs 25.7 mm
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
- Stronger battery score: 73 vs 68
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 33% higher charging: 240 W vs 180 W
- 18% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 76 Wh
Display
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz+9% | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 428 nits | 480 nits+12% |
Performance
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | AMD Ryzen 7 260 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, up to 85W) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | PCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,673Bottom 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 13,299Bottom 48% |
Battery
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh+18% |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 13 h |
| Charging | 180 W | 240 W+33% |
Design
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.1 kg+5% | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm+23% | 25.7 mm |
| Material | — | Plastic body with aluminum lid |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB4 Type-C (full function), 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (offline charging), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet (RJ-45), 3.5mm combo jack | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, one with G-SYNC and power delivery), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | FHD 1080p IR camera with privacy shutter | FHD with IR |
| Biometrics | Windows Hello face recognition (IR camera), no fingerprint reader | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71) | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI (PHN16S-71)VSAcer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)vs Alienware x16 R2VSAcer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)vs Dell 14 PremiumVSAcer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-A71)vs Lenovo Googlebook 15VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs HUAWEI MateBook 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs Acer Swift Go 16 AI (SFG16-A71)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs ASUS Zenbook A14 (UX3407)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VS