Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs MSI Raider A18 HX A9W

WINNER
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
56.8Inno Score
VS
MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
56.7Inno Score
51.1Performance70.9
85Graphics97.5
31.8Displayspec-based51.1
94.7Batteryspec-based42.8
32.7Portabilityspec-based20
2 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)9 spec wins — MSI Raider A18 HX A9W

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) scores 56.8 against 56.7 for MSI Raider A18 HX A9W. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)

  • 29% lower weight: 2.57 kg vs 3.6 kg
  • 29% lower thickness: 22.7 mm vs 32.1 mm

Reasons to pick the MSI Raider A18 HX A9W

  • Stronger performance score: 71 vs 51
  • Stronger graphics score: 98 vs 85
  • 196% higher Peak brightness: 889 nits vs 300 nits
  • 122% higher charging: 400 W vs 180 W
  • 100% higher RAM: 64 GB vs 32 GB

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Screen size16 ″18 ″+13%
Panel typeIPSMini-LED
Resolution2560x16003840x2400
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits889 nits+196%

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
ProcessorIntel Core 7 240HAMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop GPU
RAM32 GB64 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB2,048 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots)PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Geekbench 6 (single)2,699Bottom 37%3,146+17%Top 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,815Top 47%19,922+44%Top 9%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)12,021Bottom 31%22,099+84%Top 9%

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Capacity96 Wh99.9 Wh+4%
Web browsing endurance—2.1 h
Charging180 W400 W+122%

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Weight2.57 kg+29%3.6 kg
Thickness22.7 mm+29%32.1 mm
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frame—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Ports2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack2x USB4 Type-C (DisplayPort, PD 3.1, Thunderbolt 4 compatible), 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, 2.5GbE RJ45, SD Express card reader, 3.5mm combo jack, Kensington lock
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam720p1080p IR with privacy shutter
BiometricsNoneFingerprint reader, IR facial recognition

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)MSI Raider A18 HX A9W
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home or Pro

Related comparisons

Try another matchup