Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA
61.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
62Inno Score
72.3Performancechip51.3
83.2chipGraphics85.9
29.8Displayspec-based55
53.1Batteryspec-based86.7
77.5Portabilityspec-based42.5
4 spec wins — ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA scores 61.6 against 62 for ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead in graphics, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA

  • Stronger performance score: 72 vs 51
  • 700% higher RAM: 128 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • 39% lower weight: 1.39 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 29% lower thickness: 15.8 mm vs 22.1 mm

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 40% higher charging: 280 W vs 200 W
  • 23% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
  • 20% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 13.3 ″

Display

Display comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Screen size13.3 ″16 ″+20%
Panel typeOLED touchscreen (ASUS Lumina OLED, 100% DCI-P3, DisplayHDR True Black 500, stylus support)IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync
Resolution2880x18002560x1600
Refresh rate60 Hz165 Hz+175%
Peak brightness500 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
GraphicsAMD Radeon 8060S (integrated, 40 compute units)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)
RAM128 GB+700%16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X-8000 (soldered, unified memory)DDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)
Storage2,048 GB+100%1,024 GB
Storage typeM.2 2230 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,975Top 25%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)19,364Top 15%—
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)—12,516Top 48%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Capacity73 Wh90 Wh+23%
Web browsing endurance9.4 h—
Charging200 W280 W+40%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Weight1.39 kg+39%2.27 kg
Thickness15.8 mm+29%22.1 mm

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Ports2x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort and power delivery), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10Gbps), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, microSD 4.0 card reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack, DC-in, XG Mobile (GC34) support2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7 (802.11be)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.2
WebcamFHD with IR720p HD
BiometricsIR camera for Windows Hello face login—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Operating systemWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup