ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
72.3Performancechip51.3
29.8Display55
53.1Battery86.7
77.5Portability42.5
4 spec wins — ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA scores 58.4 against 58.4 for ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA edges ahead in portability and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA
- Stronger performance score: 72 vs 51
- Stronger portability score: 78 vs 43
- 700% higher RAM: 128 GB vs 16 GB
- 100% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- 39% lower weight: 1.39 kg vs 2.27 kg
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 53
- 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 40% higher charging: 280 W vs 200 W
- 23% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 73 Wh
Display
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 13.3 ″ | 16 ″+20% |
| Panel type | OLED touchscreen (ASUS Lumina OLED, 100% DCI-P3, DisplayHDR True Black 500, stylus support) | IPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync |
| Resolution | 2880x1800 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz+175% |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX |
| Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S (integrated, 40 compute units) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W) |
| RAM | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X-8000 (soldered, unified memory) | DDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB) |
| Storage | 2,048 GB+100% | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2230 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,975Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 19,364Top 15% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 73 Wh | 90 Wh+23% |
| Web browsing endurance | 9.4 h | — |
| Charging | 200 W | 280 W+40% |
Design
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.39 kg+39% | 2.27 kg |
| Thickness | 15.8 mm+29% | 22.1 mm |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, DisplayPort and power delivery), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10Gbps), 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, microSD 4.0 card reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack, DC-in, XG Mobile (GC34) support | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Webcam | FHD with IR | 720p HD |
| Biometrics | IR camera for Windows Hello face login | — |
Software
| Spec | ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EA | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAvs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)VSASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAvs Samsung Galaxy Book6 EdgeVSASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAvs ASUS Googlebook 14VSASUS ProArt PX13 (2026) HN7306EAvs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7xVSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)vs Samsung Galaxy Book6 EdgeVSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)vs ASUS Googlebook 14VSASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7xVS