ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)
54.3chipPerformancechip49.8
87.6Graphicschip53.4
55Displayspec-based41.6
50.7Batteryspec-based66.7
38.2Portabilityspec-based74
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)3 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) scores 55.6 against 55.5 for ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) edges ahead in graphics and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 54 vs 50
- Stronger graphics score: 88 vs 53
- 131% higher charging: 150 W vs 65 W
- 100% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)
- 41% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 26.9 mm
- 32% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.2 kg
- 19% higher capacity: 75 Wh vs 63 Wh
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB | OLED (100% DCI-P3, glossy) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-14650HX (up to 5.2GHz, 16C/24T) | AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 85W (8GB GDDR7) | AMD Radeon 860M (integrated) |
| RAM | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB) | LPDDR5X (soldered) |
| Storage | 2,048 GB+100% | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2x M.2 slots) | M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | 13,644Top 31% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 63 Wh | 75 Wh+19% |
| Charging | 150 W+131% | 65 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.5 kg+32% |
| Thickness | 26.9 mm | 15.9 mm+41% |
| Material | All-black chassis with an anti-fingerprint coating, MIL-STD-810H tested | Metal |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery), 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 1x USB4 Gen 3 Type-C (40Gbps, display and power delivery), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C (5Gbps, display and power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 (TMDS), 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Webcam | 720p HD camera | FHD with IR and privacy shutter |
| Biometrics | — | IR camera for Windows Hello face login |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home or Pro |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)vs HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14VSASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)vs Acer Swift 14 AI (SF14-11)VSASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)vs ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405)VSASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)vs HP ZBook 8 G1i 14VSASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)vs ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405)VSASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)vs HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14VSASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)vs Acer TravelMate P4 Spin 14 AI TMP414RN-56VSASUS Vivobook S16 (M5606KA)vs HP EliteBook X G2q 14VS