ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) vs Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)
48.5Performancechip55.1
82.1Graphicschip61
41.5Displayspec-based40
64Batteryspec-based73.3
69.8Portabilityspec-based64.9
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)4 spec wins — Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) scores 57.7 against 57.6 for Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) edges ahead in graphics, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)
- Stronger graphics score: 82 vs 61
- 100% higher charging: 200 W vs 100 W
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 17% lower weight: 1.46 kg vs 1.76 kg
Reasons to pick the Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)
- Stronger performance score: 55 vs 49
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 15% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 19.9 mm
- 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″
- 10% higher capacity: 80 Wh vs 73 Wh
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 14 ″ | 16 ″+14% |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare (100% sRGB, G-Sync) | OLED |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core Ultra 7 255H |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6) | Intel Arc 140T (integrated) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X-7500 (soldered) | DDR5 |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD (2 slots) | NVMe SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,846Top 46% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 13,799Top 49% | — |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | 10,397Bottom 22% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 73 Wh | 80 Wh+10% |
| Charging | 200 W+100% | 100 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.46 kg+17% | 1.76 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 16.9 mm+15% |
| Material | Aluminum lid and bottom panel, plastic keyboard deck (MIL-STD-810H tested) | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB4 (DisplayPort/PD), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 2x full-function USB-C, HDMI, 3.5mm audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD IR camera | 1080p |
| Biometrics | Windows Hello IR face recognition | Face recognition |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | Lenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs Acer Swift Spin 14 AI (SFSP14-Q51T)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs ASUS Googlebook 14VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14VSLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)vs Dell XPS 16 (2026)VSLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)vs Lenovo Legion R9000P 2026VSLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)vs Acer Swift Spin 14 AI (SFSP14-Q51T)VSLenovo Xiaoxin Pro 16 2025 (Intel)vs ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)VS